Jeff Bowles
09-26-2007, 11:37 PM
While checking my NRA-ILA alerts today I ran across this story on how Senator Diane Feinstein claimed that the NRA supported s.1237 and was qucikly rebuffed by NRA's Chris Cox.
Find Below the NRA headline ------------------------------------------------------------------
NRA Letter Asking Senator Feinstein For Correction About S. 1237
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Senator Dianne Feinstein claimed in constituent communication that NRA supports S. 1237, legislation that would allow the Attorney General to deny firearm purchases if the person is "suspected" (but not proven) to be involved in terrorist activity. In fact, NRA has opposed this bill from the moment it was introduced.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What we have here is a failure of this senator to use her feeble brain!
Here is a link the .pdf document of the communication that the senator sent to the unknown constituant and Chris Cox's response. http://www.jefferybowles.com/feinstein_s1237-1.pdf
I think it would be in line with the thinking of this forum if we were to send the senator from California a quick little note letting her know what our positions are regarding s.1237, don't you think?
Here is the link to the email form to contact her..
http://www.capwiz.com/nra/mail/?id=347&type=CO&state=CA
Find Below the NRA headline ------------------------------------------------------------------
NRA Letter Asking Senator Feinstein For Correction About S. 1237
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Senator Dianne Feinstein claimed in constituent communication that NRA supports S. 1237, legislation that would allow the Attorney General to deny firearm purchases if the person is "suspected" (but not proven) to be involved in terrorist activity. In fact, NRA has opposed this bill from the moment it was introduced.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What we have here is a failure of this senator to use her feeble brain!
Here is a link the .pdf document of the communication that the senator sent to the unknown constituant and Chris Cox's response. http://www.jefferybowles.com/feinstein_s1237-1.pdf
I think it would be in line with the thinking of this forum if we were to send the senator from California a quick little note letting her know what our positions are regarding s.1237, don't you think?
Here is the link to the email form to contact her..
http://www.capwiz.com/nra/mail/?id=347&type=CO&state=CA